Now Reading
Wii component cables VS the bundled composite cables
112

Wii component cables VS the bundled composite cables

by Bradley DeLorenzoNovember 27, 2006

My Official Nintendo component cables arrived today. Hooked it right up and started playing. The first thing that really jumped out at me was when I launched Zelda and saw Link on Epona, I was amazed. It’s sort of bitter sweet, it tends to sharpen the edges so much they become too defined, but it’s WAY better especially during motion. I took a whole bunch of screen shots.

Update 1: After playing Zelda for 5 hours after I took these pictures, I don’t think I could ever go back to the composite cables. The clarity was stunning, it felt kind of like a PC game the way things were so clean.

Update 2: SirVenom here. As of about Christmas ’06, MadCatz is featuring our images to promote their component cables. See it here.

Some things to note: These pictures OFF of the TV and even with an LCD you get scan lines (which are apparent in picture 4 on the left, those are NOT in game, but something the camera pics up on.
Also, I do agree that taking pictures of your TV (even in a controlled environment, like I did) doesn’t do the pictures justice. I’ve come to learn that gamespot has some really great “captures” with rollovers, showing the difference:

This is on a Samsung 42″ LCD TV.

Click to Enlarge the pictures

COMPONENT ON THE LEFT | AV CABLES ON THE RIGHT

——————————–

Checkout The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword Walkthrough, tips, tricks:

About The Author
Bradley DeLorenzo
112 Comments
  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 3:37 am

    Is that running 480p or 480i? I have my Wii hooked up with component cables but only have 480i and I was wondering how big a difference it was from the pack in cables.

  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 3:37 am

    Is that running 480p or 480i? I have my Wii hooked up with component cables but only have 480i and I was wondering how big a difference it was from the pack in cables.

  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 3:37 am

    Is that running 480p or 480i? I have my Wii hooked up with component cables but only have 480i and I was wondering how big a difference it was from the pack in cables.

  • Nick
    November 27, 2006 at 8:37 pm

    Is that running 480p or 480i? I have my Wii hooked up with component cables but only have 480i and I was wondering how big a difference it was from the pack in cables.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 3:41 am

    This is 480p. The difference is pretty big, you can really tell when you’re actually moving around, these stills don’t do it justice.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 3:41 am

    This is 480p. The difference is pretty big, you can really tell when you’re actually moving around, these stills don’t do it justice.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 3:41 am

    This is 480p. The difference is pretty big, you can really tell when you’re actually moving around, these stills don’t do it justice.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 27, 2006 at 8:41 pm

    This is 480p. The difference is pretty big, you can really tell when you’re actually moving around, these stills don’t do it justice.

  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    COuld you do a couple of screens with 480i difference?

  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    COuld you do a couple of screens with 480i difference?

  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    COuld you do a couple of screens with 480i difference?

  • Nick
    November 28, 2006 at 8:51 am

    COuld you do a couple of screens with 480i difference?

  • Tony
    November 28, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    480i and 480p would look the same in screenshots. i vs p has more to do with fluidity than pure picture clarity.

  • Tony
    November 28, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    480i and 480p would look the same in screenshots. i vs p has more to do with fluidity than pure picture clarity.

  • Tony
    November 28, 2006 at 9:23 am

    480i and 480p would look the same in screenshots. i vs p has more to do with fluidity than pure picture clarity.

  • BlindsideDork
    November 28, 2006 at 4:47 pm

    Umm, am I the only one who doesn’t think it looks better?

    It seems with the A/V the “blurrynesS” is just used to cover the jagged lines on shapes.

    I have seen other comparisons and just not sure if I should invest in some or not.

  • BlindsideDork
    November 28, 2006 at 9:47 am

    Umm, am I the only one who doesn’t think it looks better?

    It seems with the A/V the “blurrynesS” is just used to cover the jagged lines on shapes.

    I have seen other comparisons and just not sure if I should invest in some or not.

  • jeez
    November 28, 2006 at 4:54 pm

    Am I the only one who thinks it looks crap with both cables ??

  • jeez
    November 28, 2006 at 4:54 pm

    Am I the only one who thinks it looks crap with both cables ??

  • jeez
    November 28, 2006 at 9:54 am

    Am I the only one who thinks it looks crap with both cables ??

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    Like I said before, the photos don’t do it justice, you have to see it in motion.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 10:42 am

    Like I said before, the photos don’t do it justice, you have to see it in motion.

  • Doug
    November 28, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    It looks like your sharpness is set way too high in all the pics, exaggerating edge transitions. Imagine a thin black line on a grey background – with sharpness set too high there will be a white halo around the black line to exaggerate the transition. Now look at the jawline and mouth on the Mii’s face. This is poor signal processing that works for selling TVs in walmart but actually degrades picture quality: think of listening to a stereo with the treble cranked. Composite video is low enough bandwidth that it rolls off the high frequency video content (think very fast transitions from black to white) so much that you can amplify the high frequency content by cranking the sharpness without much ill effect, but the same setting on high bandwidth component will give everything an etched look.

  • Doug
    November 28, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    It looks like your sharpness is set way too high in all the pics, exaggerating edge transitions. Imagine a thin black line on a grey background – with sharpness set too high there will be a white halo around the black line to exaggerate the transition. Now look at the jawline and mouth on the Mii’s face. This is poor signal processing that works for selling TVs in walmart but actually degrades picture quality: think of listening to a stereo with the treble cranked. Composite video is low enough bandwidth that it rolls off the high frequency video content (think very fast transitions from black to white) so much that you can amplify the high frequency content by cranking the sharpness without much ill effect, but the same setting on high bandwidth component will give everything an etched look.

  • Doug
    November 28, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    It looks like your sharpness is set way too high in all the pics, exaggerating edge transitions. Imagine a thin black line on a grey background – with sharpness set too high there will be a white halo around the black line to exaggerate the transition. Now look at the jawline and mouth on the Mii’s face. This is poor signal processing that works for selling TVs in walmart but actually degrades picture quality: think of listening to a stereo with the treble cranked. Composite video is low enough bandwidth that it rolls off the high frequency video content (think very fast transitions from black to white) so much that you can amplify the high frequency content by cranking the sharpness without much ill effect, but the same setting on high bandwidth component will give everything an etched look.

  • Doug
    November 28, 2006 at 10:43 am

    It looks like your sharpness is set way too high in all the pics, exaggerating edge transitions. Imagine a thin black line on a grey background – with sharpness set too high there will be a white halo around the black line to exaggerate the transition. Now look at the jawline and mouth on the Mii’s face. This is poor signal processing that works for selling TVs in walmart but actually degrades picture quality: think of listening to a stereo with the treble cranked. Composite video is low enough bandwidth that it rolls off the high frequency video content (think very fast transitions from black to white) so much that you can amplify the high frequency content by cranking the sharpness without much ill effect, but the same setting on high bandwidth component will give everything an etched look.

  • francisco
    November 28, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    am i the only one who thinks that the ones on the right look better?

  • francisco
    November 28, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    am i the only one who thinks that the ones on the right look better?

  • francisco
    November 28, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    am i the only one who thinks that the ones on the right look better?

  • francisco
    November 28, 2006 at 10:58 am

    am i the only one who thinks that the ones on the right look better?

  • guest
    November 28, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    To tell you the truth, the ones on the right look better in my opinion.

  • guest
    November 28, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    To tell you the truth, the ones on the right look better in my opinion.

  • guest
    November 28, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    To tell you the truth, the ones on the right look better in my opinion.

  • guest
    November 28, 2006 at 11:03 am

    To tell you the truth, the ones on the right look better in my opinion.

  • Nathan
    November 28, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    When did you order your cables?

  • Nathan
    November 28, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    When did you order your cables?

  • Nathan
    November 28, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    When did you order your cables?

  • Nathan
    November 28, 2006 at 11:04 am

    When did you order your cables?

  • November 28, 2006 at 6:07 pm

    Since none of the pictures are of the exact same “frame” I can’t really make comparisons here. I can see differences, but if the point is to illustrate how the component cables change the picture, I don’t see it.

  • November 28, 2006 at 6:07 pm

    Since none of the pictures are of the exact same “frame” I can’t really make comparisons here. I can see differences, but if the point is to illustrate how the component cables change the picture, I don’t see it.

  • November 28, 2006 at 11:07 am

    Since none of the pictures are of the exact same “frame” I can’t really make comparisons here. I can see differences, but if the point is to illustrate how the component cables change the picture, I don’t see it.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 6:30 pm

    For those who can’t tell the difference:

    Look at the background and links shield in this shot:
    http://static.flickr.com/112/308246289_01bbefb16c_o.jpg

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 11:30 am

    For those who can’t tell the difference:

    Look at the background and links shield in this shot:
    http://static.flickr.com/112/308246289_01bbefb16c_o.jpg

  • Josh
    November 28, 2006 at 7:21 pm

    When people are desperately doing anything to make the Wii LOOK like a next-gen offering already then I think the Wii may end up as an Icarus and no I don’t mean Kid Icarus.

  • Josh
    November 28, 2006 at 7:21 pm

    When people are desperately doing anything to make the Wii LOOK like a next-gen offering already then I think the Wii may end up as an Icarus and no I don’t mean Kid Icarus.

  • Josh
    November 28, 2006 at 12:21 pm

    When people are desperately doing anything to make the Wii LOOK like a next-gen offering already then I think the Wii may end up as an Icarus and no I don’t mean Kid Icarus.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 8:25 pm

    How is hooking up your system with cables that are meant for your TV, desperate? It’s just what my TV accepts as an input.

    As far as graphics, I was 100% happy with Zelda before the component cables, this is just icing on the sweet sweet cake.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 8:25 pm

    How is hooking up your system with cables that are meant for your TV, desperate? It’s just what my TV accepts as an input.

    As far as graphics, I was 100% happy with Zelda before the component cables, this is just icing on the sweet sweet cake.

  • hey_suburbia
    November 28, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    How is hooking up your system with cables that are meant for your TV, desperate? It’s just what my TV accepts as an input.

    As far as graphics, I was 100% happy with Zelda before the component cables, this is just icing on the sweet sweet cake.

  • Al Dunstan
    November 28, 2006 at 2:17 pm

    Turn down the sharpness on your Samsung. That is why it looks too sharp. If you want to set up your set properly, buy a copy of Video Essentials on DVD. You won’t believe how good your set really is.

  • Al Dunstan
    November 28, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Turn down the sharpness on your Samsung. That is why it looks too sharp. If you want to set up your set properly, buy a copy of Video Essentials on DVD. You won’t believe how good your set really is.

  • Al Dunstan
    November 28, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Turn down the sharpness on your Samsung. That is why it looks too sharp. If you want to set up your set properly, buy a copy of Video Essentials on DVD. You won’t believe how good your set really is.

  • Al Dunstan
    November 28, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Turn down the sharpness on your Samsung. That is why it looks too sharp. If you want to set up your set properly, buy a copy of Video Essentials on DVD. You won’t believe how good your set really is.

  • Mr 73
    November 29, 2006 at 12:19 am

    I certainly see the difference, but a large percentage of people are so used to getting poor video quality (it’s what we’re used to) that they really don’t know what to look for and where. I know that people buy LCD/Plasma for the space-saving, but “tube”/crt tv’s still give the best picture. I stand behind your move toward component cables, even on a $100 tv they will make a difference. Also like Al Dunstan said, using the Video Essentials DVD to properly tune your tv will also make a hell of a difference too.

  • Mr 73
    November 29, 2006 at 12:19 am

    I certainly see the difference, but a large percentage of people are so used to getting poor video quality (it’s what we’re used to) that they really don’t know what to look for and where. I know that people buy LCD/Plasma for the space-saving, but “tube”/crt tv’s still give the best picture. I stand behind your move toward component cables, even on a $100 tv they will make a difference. Also like Al Dunstan said, using the Video Essentials DVD to properly tune your tv will also make a hell of a difference too.

  • Mr 73
    November 29, 2006 at 12:19 am

    I certainly see the difference, but a large percentage of people are so used to getting poor video quality (it’s what we’re used to) that they really don’t know what to look for and where. I know that people buy LCD/Plasma for the space-saving, but “tube”/crt tv’s still give the best picture. I stand behind your move toward component cables, even on a $100 tv they will make a difference. Also like Al Dunstan said, using the Video Essentials DVD to properly tune your tv will also make a hell of a difference too.

  • Mr 73
    November 28, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    I certainly see the difference, but a large percentage of people are so used to getting poor video quality (it’s what we’re used to) that they really don’t know what to look for and where. I know that people buy LCD/Plasma for the space-saving, but “tube”/crt tv’s still give the best picture. I stand behind your move toward component cables, even on a $100 tv they will make a difference. Also like Al Dunstan said, using the Video Essentials DVD to properly tune your tv will also make a hell of a difference too.

  • November 29, 2006 at 12:38 am

    Wow, that sure is awful. It really does look like GC graphics no matter what cables you use.

  • November 29, 2006 at 12:38 am

    Wow, that sure is awful. It really does look like GC graphics no matter what cables you use.

  • November 29, 2006 at 12:38 am

    Wow, that sure is awful. It really does look like GC graphics no matter what cables you use.

  • November 28, 2006 at 5:38 pm

    Wow, that sure is awful. It really does look like GC graphics no matter what cables you use.

  • Lexi
    November 29, 2006 at 12:44 am

    GC Graphics huh? Could that at all be because it is still primarily a GameCube game? Ever think of that? Has anyone yet complained about the graphics in the GC version of TP? No, people are saying that they look superb for a GC game. Seriously, people really have to remember that TP was built for GameCube.

  • Lexi
    November 29, 2006 at 12:44 am

    GC Graphics huh? Could that at all be because it is still primarily a GameCube game? Ever think of that? Has anyone yet complained about the graphics in the GC version of TP? No, people are saying that they look superb for a GC game. Seriously, people really have to remember that TP was built for GameCube.

  • Lexi
    November 28, 2006 at 5:44 pm

    GC Graphics huh? Could that at all be because it is still primarily a GameCube game? Ever think of that? Has anyone yet complained about the graphics in the GC version of TP? No, people are saying that they look superb for a GC game. Seriously, people really have to remember that TP was built for GameCube.

  • Gamer4Life
    November 29, 2006 at 2:57 pm

    MY FRIENDS HERE THIS. I OWN A SANYO FLAT SCREEN 20IN TV THAT AFTER OWING A GAMECUBE FOR 3 MONTHS, HOOKED UP COMPOSITE AND LET ME SAY…IT MAKES A HUUUGE DIFFERENCE. THE WII WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT. AFTER COMPOSITE THERE IS NO GOING BACK. DON’T TRUST THESE SCREEN SHOTS, GET UP, GO OUT THERE AND FIND OUT WITH YOUR OWN TWO EYES. A REAL LIFE SIDE BY SIDE ON THE SAME SET, YOU WILL SEE AND THE REST WILL BE HISTORY.

  • Gamer4Life
    November 29, 2006 at 7:57 am

    MY FRIENDS HERE THIS. I OWN A SANYO FLAT SCREEN 20IN TV THAT AFTER OWING A GAMECUBE FOR 3 MONTHS, HOOKED UP COMPOSITE AND LET ME SAY…IT MAKES A HUUUGE DIFFERENCE. THE WII WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT. AFTER COMPOSITE THERE IS NO GOING BACK. DON’T TRUST THESE SCREEN SHOTS, GET UP, GO OUT THERE AND FIND OUT WITH YOUR OWN TWO EYES. A REAL LIFE SIDE BY SIDE ON THE SAME SET, YOU WILL SEE AND THE REST WILL BE HISTORY.

  • jakoub
    November 29, 2006 at 7:34 pm

    people that don’t notice the difference or think that the images on the right are better have no concept of hi-def. its like my buddy that came over to watch my 40 in LCD and goes “looks the same as my 20in crt… is this supposed to be HD?” you just scratch your head at those people… also the only CRTs that are better than flat panels are the very high end huuge heavy ones that can do HD…

  • jakoub
    November 29, 2006 at 12:34 pm

    people that don’t notice the difference or think that the images on the right are better have no concept of hi-def. its like my buddy that came over to watch my 40 in LCD and goes “looks the same as my 20in crt… is this supposed to be HD?” you just scratch your head at those people… also the only CRTs that are better than flat panels are the very high end huuge heavy ones that can do HD…

  • Matt
    November 29, 2006 at 8:54 pm

    Geez, PS3 fanboys, go post somewhere else.

    PS3 fanboys to world: Wii isn’t HD! Wii isn’t next gen! Wii graphics suck!

    World to PS3 fanboys: Huh? DId you say something? I’m busy playing Wii.

  • Matt
    November 29, 2006 at 8:54 pm

    Geez, PS3 fanboys, go post somewhere else.

    PS3 fanboys to world: Wii isn’t HD! Wii isn’t next gen! Wii graphics suck!

    World to PS3 fanboys: Huh? DId you say something? I’m busy playing Wii.

  • Matt
    November 29, 2006 at 1:54 pm

    Geez, PS3 fanboys, go post somewhere else.

    PS3 fanboys to world: Wii isn’t HD! Wii isn’t next gen! Wii graphics suck!

    World to PS3 fanboys: Huh? DId you say something? I’m busy playing Wii.

  • December 1, 2006 at 4:07 pm

    I wouldn’t say the comparisons are stellar, mainly because they are photos of the image on a TV, rather than input directly into a computer.

    My CRT has component input and the only thing I usually notice between SVideo and Component when using my DVD player is the colors seem more vibrant.

    Going to be getting component cables soon for my Wii anyway.

  • December 1, 2006 at 9:07 am

    I wouldn’t say the comparisons are stellar, mainly because they are photos of the image on a TV, rather than input directly into a computer.

    My CRT has component input and the only thing I usually notice between SVideo and Component when using my DVD player is the colors seem more vibrant.

    Going to be getting component cables soon for my Wii anyway.

  • Floyd
    December 9, 2006 at 8:02 pm

    I just bought the Component cables from Asyd and on my 16:9 52 inches TV: THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL! Everything still looks edged and squared… And yeah, I changed my setting to 480p…

    I’m really disapointed…

  • Floyd
    December 9, 2006 at 8:02 pm

    I just bought the Component cables from Asyd and on my 16:9 52 inches TV: THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL! Everything still looks edged and squared… And yeah, I changed my setting to 480p…

    I’m really disapointed…

  • Floyd
    December 9, 2006 at 1:02 pm

    I just bought the Component cables from Asyd and on my 16:9 52 inches TV: THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL! Everything still looks edged and squared… And yeah, I changed my setting to 480p…

    I’m really disapointed…

  • SirVenom
    January 8, 2007 at 9:44 pm

    @Gavin
    “Wow, that sure is awful. It really does look like GC graphics no matter what cables you use.”

    Twilight Princess is run on GC graphics….

  • SirVenom
    January 8, 2007 at 2:44 pm

    @Gavin
    “Wow, that sure is awful. It really does look like GC graphics no matter what cables you use.”

    Twilight Princess is run on GC graphics….

  • slinky6
    March 23, 2007 at 2:08 am

    I bought an official component cable and I’m loving it, but there’s one thing that annoys me: whenever there’s a blue transition, like the sky changing from night to day, I get these vertical lines on the blue area, they’re like half an inch apart and slightly darker blue. Also, when I play GC games on my Wii I get the same type of thing for all transitions.

  • slinky6
    March 22, 2007 at 7:08 pm

    I bought an official component cable and I’m loving it, but there’s one thing that annoys me: whenever there’s a blue transition, like the sky changing from night to day, I get these vertical lines on the blue area, they’re like half an inch apart and slightly darker blue. Also, when I play GC games on my Wii I get the same type of thing for all transitions.

  • June 21, 2007 at 4:04 am

    Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! wacgclbnfadag

  • June 20, 2007 at 11:04 pm

    Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! wacgclbnfadag

  • don fdf
    June 25, 2007 at 12:16 pm

    Been looking for info about this. thx for posting those screens!
    I see the difference on these screens and I am gettingt the cable!

  • don fdf
    June 25, 2007 at 7:16 am

    Been looking for info about this. thx for posting those screens!
    I see the difference on these screens and I am gettingt the cable!

  • Gwen
    January 21, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    Your screenshots are awful and do not allow any conclusion. Sometimes, I cannot be even sure that pictures are not swapped…

  • Gwen
    January 21, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Your screenshots are awful and do not allow any conclusion. Sometimes, I cannot be even sure that pictures are not swapped…

  • Gerry
    June 21, 2009 at 4:43 am

    I don’t know why Nintendo don’t make an accessory that scales the wii to 720 or 1080, that’s the only way to get rid of those jagged lines. otherwise you only get the super blurry image of 480i or the super colorful but extremely jagged lines of 480p. The cables don’t make a big difference with the lines, just the colors.

  • Gerry
    June 21, 2009 at 4:43 am

    I don’t know why Nintendo don’t make an accessory that scales the wii to 720 or 1080, that’s the only way to get rid of those jagged lines. otherwise you only get the super blurry image of 480i or the super colorful but extremely jagged lines of 480p. The cables don’t make a big difference with the lines, just the colors.

  • Gerry
    June 20, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    I don’t know why Nintendo don’t make an accessory that scales the wii to 720 or 1080, that’s the only way to get rid of those jagged lines. otherwise you only get the super blurry image of 480i or the super colorful but extremely jagged lines of 480p. The cables don’t make a big difference with the lines, just the colors.

  • May 15, 2010 at 1:34 am

    Wii component cables shows high quality image resolutions unlike bundled composite cables.

  • May 18, 2010 at 8:58 pm

    SS don't look so much difference. Have you tried it on full hd tv?

  • Someguy
    July 13, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    They don't make THAT much of a difference, but if you want the best possible image quality out of your Wii, the Component cable is the way to go.

    • Gregory
      October 9, 2011 at 5:24 pm

      They do actually. There’s a HUGE difference in quality, at least on ps3. (I know i should be using HDMI but my tv doesnt accept it [1080i rear projection hdtv])

    • guest
      November 14, 2011 at 10:01 am

      they do make a noticable difference. The person(s) who took those pictures didn’t know how to properly use a camera. Like mentionned above, the Wii isn’t Next Gen and isn’t HD.

  • December 5, 2010 at 7:16 am

    PS3 fanboys to world: Wii isn’t HD! Wii isn’t next gen! Wii graphics suck!

Leave a Response